From the Bookshelf: LIQUID MEMORY Why Wine Matters

by artfuldiner on June 29, 2010

in Breaking News, Wine

liquid-memoryJonathan Nossiter’s LIQUID MEMORY Why Wine Matters (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 262 pp., $26.00) is a book that you will either love or hate – possibly both. Mr. Nossiter, filmmaker, former sommelier, and oenological maverick, stirred up no end of controversy with his Mondovino, an incendiary (some would say subversive) documentary about the wine world; and now, with LIQUID MEMORY, he’s adding more fuel to the fire.

 

Mr. Nossiter is a staunch defender of the concept of terroir, a French word for which there is no exact English translation. In the parlance of the vineyard, however, it generally refers to the way in which soil, climate, grape variety, and a number of other factors combine to endow a wine with its own unique character; which, in turn, bestows a distinctly discernable taste (and sense of place) upon the palate. This concept is much revered among Old World winemakers of, most notably, France, Italy and Germany.

 

Obversely, to New World winemakers – namely, in the Americas and Australiaterroir is little more than a marketing ploy; in other words, a colossal flimflam. And this opinion, interestingly enough, is also held by a number of wine critics.

 

There’s a great deal going on in LIQUID MEMORY; but the crux of the matter boils down to Mr. Nossiter’s contention that, since the latter part of the 1970s, the wonderful world of wine has been systematically herded away from terroir-based vintages toward oaky, lethally-alcoholic “fruit bombs” that are completely devoid of character and local identity.

 

And one of the chief villains in this process of global homogenization of taste is American critic Robert Parker: “In my opinion, Robert Parker, working with such importers, has turned a wine world of independent winemakers making terroir-based wines that were identifiable by their origins, into a consultants’, importers’ and reps’ game, where wines are literally tailored just for one palate.”

 

It doesn’t take the reader long to realize that Mr. Nossiter has a penchant for hyperbole, as well as being given to spirited bouts of pomposity upon occasion… To say that he is opinionated – especially when he has a burr under his saddle, which is quite often – would be a gross understatement. On the other hand… I tend to agree with him on almost all counts.

 

Who, for example, has not sipped and savored a local wine at an outdoor cafe in France, Germany, or Italy – perhaps only a few yards from where the grapes were grown – and failed to marvel at a vintage that was truly sui generis to this “particular place.” The grape variety may be produced elsewhere – perhaps even under similar circumstances – but it will never taste quite the same as “this wine.” Why? Because “this” wine is inextricably married to “this” soil… and “this” climate… and the “people” whose labors and collective cultural legacy have brought it to ultimate fruition. It is like no other wine. It is unique. It is a product of this particular terroir and no other.

 

However, it is Mr. Nossiter’s scathing comprehensive criticism of wine guru Robert Parker that is, in and of itself, worth the price of the book. From a personal perspective, I subscribed to Parker’s Wine Advocate for a number of years, much preferring its unadorned pages to the glitzy commercialism and blatant appeal to the rich & shameless propagated by the Wine Spectator. However, as time went on I became more and more disenchanted with Parker’s recommendations, finding them – especially the red wines – exceedingly ponderous, lethargically alcoholic, and lacking in finesse. I freely confess that my preference is for subtlety and elegance rather than brute force.

 

When it comes to preference, however, as Mr. Nossiter notes, it is Parker’s that has prevailed. And his penchant for big, bold, high-alcohol fruit bombs has initiated a rather vicious circle in which wine-makers around the world, coveting his numerical ratings (and subsequent increase in sales), have rushed to please his palate, thus aiding and abetting the global homogenization of taste.

 

liquid-memory2Nothing, of course, is quite that simple. Hell, it never is. And Robert Parker certainly isn’t the only culprit in this oenological drama. Be that as it may, however, Jonathan Nossiter’s LIQUID MEMORY is a book that should be at the top of every serious wine lover’s summer reading list.

 

Cheers!

 

TAD

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: